ANALYSIS OF REFERRING PROCESS FROM THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT TO GENERAL SURGERY
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Referring patients from the emergency department to specialty doctors is crucial but frustrating. This study identified discrepancy and common ground in the referring process between emergency doctors and general surgeons. A 32-day database of surgical referrals was analysed. Moreover, a ten-question survey was sent to both emergency and surgical doctors. Inappropriate referrals were 19%, with a peak of 50% in 24 hours. Appendicitis (23%) and small bowel obstruction (15%) were the commonest inappropriate diagnoses. The survey showed frustration was reported more by surgeons (P <.05), believing patients are not yet sufficiently assessed when referred (P <.05). A common consensus was found on the need for specific criteria to guide surgical referrals. Improvement of communication is recommended, especially with regard to the attitude used during referrals. Specialties’ relevance for specific conditions needs to be clarified. Eventually, a specific system is required to formally report inappropriate referrals and unprofessional behaviour.
Downloads
Citations
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.