Original Articles
Vol. 18 (2023)

FENTANYL VS MORPHINE AS ADJUVANT TO SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: September 3 2025
4
Views
2
Downloads

Authors

In patients undergoing caesarean section (CS) with spinal anesthesia, the superiority of one intrathecal opioid over another one is not fully established. In order to investigate this, we joined the PAIN OUT Project (NCT02083835) for a two-year period. We surveyed patients undergoing elective CS with intrathecal anesthesia. Patients were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire. Primary outcomes were: worst pain experienced, time spent in severe pain, relief received by treatment, satisfaction about pain management, wish for more pain treatment. We included 144 patients. The two main pain management combinations used were: bupivacainemorphine (B-M, n=100) and bupivacaine-fentanyl (B-F, n=32). There were no differences in any of the primary outcomes between the groups. The B-F population received more intravenous/intramuscular opioids during the intraoperative (p<0.01) and the postoperative (p<0.001) period. The choice of morphine or fentanyl as adjunct to local anesthetic in spinal anesthesia for CS does not affect the patient’s experience with regards to pain management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite



FENTANYL VS MORPHINE AS ADJUVANT TO SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. (2025). EuroMediterranean Biomedical Journal, 18, 79-83. https://doi.org/10.3269/ebmj.2023.39

Most read articles by the same author(s)