Original Articles
Vol. 15 (2020)

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF VANCOUVER TYPE B PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: October 16 2025
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Periprosthetic femoral fractures are a serious complication after total hip arthroplasty. The Vancouver classification divides fractures on location, implant stability and residual bone stock. The treatment of Vancouver B fractures is surgical and the first decision point surrounds whether or not the stem is well-fixed: well-fixed stems require Open Reduction and Internal Fixation, whereas loose stems require revision arthroplasty. Vancouver B1 fractures are treated with ORIF and had a poorer outcome when compared with B2 and B3 fractures because some B1 fractures were, in reality, probably B2 fractures. In Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures, the stem is loose and the revision of implant is mandatory. Controversy remains around the indications to perform ORIF or revision for Vancouver B fracture. In the future, it could be useful to combine information from both the radiographs and the medical records in order to be able to more correctly evaluate the type of fracture and its treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite



MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF VANCOUVER TYPE B PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. (2025). EuroMediterranean Biomedical Journal, 15. https://doi.org/10.3269/ebmj.2020.167