Original Articles Open access

LAPAROSCOPIC VS. CONVENTIONAL APPENDECTOMY: OUR EXPERIENCE AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Authors

Published
12 March 2026
Section
Original Articles
DOI
10.3269/chhpqj97

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies, treated either by laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) or conventional open appendectomy. This retrospective study analysed 132 patients who underwent surgery at the Policlinico G. Rodolico in Catania (Italy) between 2020 and 2023, comparing the two approaches in terms of operative time, complications, and length of hospital stay. The results indicate that the laparoscopic technique, performed in 62.12% of cases, offers advantages such as shorter operative time, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospitalisation. However, it presents a higher risk of intra-abdominal abscesses compared with the open technique. LA thus proves to be a beneficial choice, particularly in cases of uncertain diagnosis.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Bhangu A, Soreide K, Di Saverio S, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2015;386:1278-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5
  2. 2. Zanghì G, Zanghì A, Di Benedetto F. [Meckel’s diverticulum complications]. Chirurgia Gastroenterologica 1993;27:91-5.
  3. 3. Shah K, Khiria L, Desai P, et al. Surgically inverting an incidentally detected Meckel’s diverticulum - Wrong method. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015;6C:289-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.07.009
  4. 4. Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;11:CD001546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4
  5. 5. Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 2010;34:2026-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0669-z
  6. 6. Mariage M, Sabbagh C, Grelpois G, et al. Surgeon’s Definition of Complicated Appendicitis: A Prospective Video Survey Study. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2019;9:1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1286
  7. 7. Menon NK. Primary adenocarcinoma of the appendix. Postgrad Med J 1980;56:448-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.56.656.448
  8. 8. Zanghì GN, Brancato G, Crescimano R, et al. Carcinoide dell’appendice vermiforme: contributo clinico. Acta Chirurgica Mediterranea 1994;10:345-7.
  9. 9. Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 2004;239:43-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103071.35986.c1
  10. 10. Golash V. Rectus sheath abscess after laparoscopic appendicectomy. J Minim Access Surg 2007;3:64-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.33275
  11. 11. Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2010;10:129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-129
  12. 12. Gilmore OJ, Martin TD. Aetiology and prevention of wound infection in appendicectomy. Br J Surg 1974;61:281-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800610407

Metrics

Citations and online attention from Dimensions, Altmetric and PlumX.

PlumX Metrics

License

Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.